Volume : 6, Issue : 7, JUL 2020

A FEMINISTIC READING OF ARUNDHATI ROY’S THE GOD OF SMALL THINGS

DR. RAJENDRA KUMAR

Abstract

This research paper offers a feminist reading of Arundhati Roy’s novel The God of Small Things, focusing on the representation of women, the operation of patriarchy, and the intersection of gender with caste and class in postcolonial Indian society. The novel, set in Kerala, presents a deeply layered narrative that reveals how social structures control, marginalize, and silence women. Through its portrayal of characters such as Ammu, Rahel, Baby Kochamma, and Mammachi, the text exposes the unequal power relations embedded in both family and society. This study aims to examine how Roy critiques these structures and highlights the struggles of women who attempt to resist them. At the center of the analysis is the character of Ammu, whose life reflects the harsh realities of gender oppression. Ammu’s experiences illustrate how women are denied autonomy and punished for transgressing social norms. Her decision to leave an abusive marriage and her later relationship with Velutha challenge the rigid “Love Laws” that govern social behavior. However, these acts of resistance lead to severe consequences, including social exclusion and personal tragedy. This research argues that Ammu’s story represents the broader condition of women in patriarchal societies, where freedom and desire are often restricted by moral codes and cultural expectations.

The paper also examines how patriarchy operates not only through male dominance but also through internalized attitudes among women themselves. Characters like Baby Kochamma and Mammachi reinforce traditional norms and participate in the oppression of other women. This highlights the complexity of gender relations, where women can both suffer under and contribute to patriarchal systems. The study emphasizes that feminism in the novel is not presented as a simple opposition between men and women but as a deeper critique of social structures that sustain inequality. Another important focus of the research is the concept of body politics. The novel shows how women’s bodies are controlled and regulated by society. Female sexuality is viewed as dangerous and must be suppressed. Ammu’s expression of desire is condemned, while similar behavior in men is often ignored. This double standard reflects the unequal moral expectations imposed on women. The paper explores how Roy uses this theme to question traditional ideas about purity, honor, and morality.

The study further investigates the intersection of caste and gender in the novel. The relationship between Ammu and Velutha, a man from a lower caste, represents a violation of both social and cultural boundaries. This intersectional perspective reveals that women’s oppression cannot be understood in isolation from other forms of inequality. Roy’s narrative shows how caste and gender work together to maintain social hierarchies. The consequences faced by Ammu and Velutha demonstrate the rigid enforcement of these structures. The experiences of Rahel, as a female child, also form an important part of the analysis. Her life reflects the long-term impact of trauma, silence, and social control. Unlike Ammu, Rahel does not openly resist, but her emotional withdrawal and detachment suggest another form of response to oppression. The study highlights how gender roles are imposed from an early age and how they shape individual identity over time.

In addition to thematic analysis, this research considers Roy’s narrative style as a form of feminist expression. The novel’s non-linear structure, fragmented storytelling, and use of symbolism reflect the complexity of women’s experiences. The idea of “small things” becomes a metaphor for marginalized voices and suppressed emotions. By focusing on these “small things,” Roy challenges dominant narratives that often ignore or minimize the experiences of women and other marginalized groups.

The methodology of this study is based on qualitative textual analysis supported by feminist theoretical frameworks. It draws on the ideas of key feminist thinkers such as Simone de Beauvoir, who discusses the construction of women as “the Other,” and Kate Millett, who examines patriarchy as a system of power. The research also considers postcolonial feminist perspectives, which emphasize the importance of cultural and social context in understanding women’s experiences.

The findings of this research suggest that The God of Small Things is a powerful critique of patriarchal society. The novel not only exposes the injustices faced by women but also questions the social norms that justify these inequalities. It presents women as complex individuals who navigate their circumstances in different ways, whether through resistance, adaptation, or silence. The text does not offer simple solutions but encourages readers to reflect on the structures that shape human relationships and identities.

In conclusion, this study establishes that Arundhati Roy’s novel is an important contribution to feminist literature. It highlights the interconnected nature of gender, caste, and class oppression and presents a nuanced understanding of women’s experiences. By giving voice to marginalized characters and challenging traditional narratives, the novel invites a reconsideration of social values and power relations. The research underscores the continuing relevance of Roy’s work in contemporary discussions on gender and equality, making The God of Small Things a significant text for feminist literary analysis.

Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

-

Article No : 6

Number of Downloads : 25

References

1. Beauvoir, Simone de. (1949). The Second Sex.
2. Millett, Kate. (1970). Sexual Politics.
3. Roy, Arundhati. (1997). The God of Small Things.
4. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. (1988). “Can the Subaltern Speak?”
5. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. (1984). “Under Western Eyes.”
6. Butler, Judith. (1990). Gender Trouble.
7. hooks, bell. (2000). Feminism is for Everybody.