Volume : 12, Issue : 4, APR 2026
IMPACT OF COGNITIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
PRASANTA KUMAR RANA
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of cognitive learning strategies such as rehearsal, elaboration, and organization on academic achievement among secondary school students. It emphasizes how learners actively process information and apply higher-order thinking skills to enhance understanding and retention. The research includes a diverse sample of students to examine variations in the use of cognitive strategies across different backgrounds. A quantitative research approach is employed to assess both achievement levels and strategy preferences. The findings are expected to demonstrate a strong positive relationship between effective cognitive strategy use and improved academic performance. The study underscores the importance of integrating strategy-based instruction into classroom teaching. It also highlights the necessity of teacher training in metacognitive instructional techniques. Ultimately, the research contributes to promoting learner autonomy and improving academic outcomes.
Keywords
COGNITIVE STRATEGIES, ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT, SECONDARY STUDENTS, LEARNING PROCESS, METACOGNITION.
Article : Download PDF
Cite This Article
IESRJ
International Educational Scientific Research Journal
E-ISSN: 2455-295X
International Indexed Journal | Multi-Disciplinary Refereed Research Journal
ISSN: 2455-295X
Peer-Reviewed Journal - Equivalent to UGC Approved Journal
Peer-Reviewed Journal
Article No : 39
Number of Downloads : 13
References
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Dignath, C., &Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
- Kaur, K. (2026). Investigating the effectiveness of cognitive learning strategies for learners: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 120–135.
- Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
- Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
- Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
- Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
- Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). Macmillan.
- Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.
- Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
- Ruiz-Martín, H., et al. (2024). Research-based learning strategies and their impact on academic achievement and motivation. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00567-5
