Volume : 12, Issue : 4, APR 2026

IMPACT OF DIGITAL LEARNING TOOLS ON STUDENTS’ ATTENTION SPAN AND MEMORY RETENTION

SATYAJIT PAYRA

Abstract

This research investigates the impact of digital learning tools on students’ attention span and memory retention. It examines the use of multimedia resources, online platforms, and interactive applications in the learning process. A mixed-method approach is adopted to analyze both qualitative responses and quantitative performance data. The study identifies both advantages and challenges associated with digital learning. The findings are expected to show that guided and structured use of digital tools enhances memory retention. However, excessive and unregulated use may negatively affect students’ attention span. The research suggests a balanced and strategic integration of technology in education. It contributes to the development of effective technology-based teaching methodologies.

Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

IESRJ

International Educational Scientific Research Journal

E-ISSN: 2455-295X

International Indexed Journal | Multi-Disciplinary Refereed Research Journal

ISSN: 2455-295X

Peer-Reviewed Journal - Equivalent to UGC Approved Journal

Peer-Reviewed Journal

Article No : 46

Number of Downloads : 11

References

1. Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., &Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? Computers & Education, 54(4), 927–931.
2. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company.
3. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction (4th ed.). Wiley.
4. Gupta, A., &Pathania, P. (2021). Digital learning in Indian education system. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3501–3517.
5. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses. Routledge.
6. Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198.
7. Kaur, G. (2020). Digital learning during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research in Education, 10(2), 45–50.
8. Kirschner, P. A., &Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245.
9. Lim, D. H., & Kim, H. J. (2003). Motivation and learner characteristics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 67–85.
10. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
11. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
12. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.
13. Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Media multitasking and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948–958.
14. Sana, F., Weston, T., &Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders learning. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31.
15. Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37–76.