Volume : 10, Issue : 10, OCT 2024

MATDAN LOKTANTRA KI AADHARSHILA

DR. KARAN SINGH

Abstract

matadaan lokataantrik samaaj mein naagarikon ke maulik adhikaaron aur jimmedaariyon mein se ek hai. yah vah prakriya hai jisake dvaara vyakti muddon aur ummeedavaaron par apanee praathamikataen aur raay vyakt karate hain, aur yah ek lokataantrik sarakaar ke kaamakaaj mein mahatvapoorn bhoomika nibhaata hai. matadaan lokatantr kee aadhaarashila hai. yah vah maadhyam hai jisake dvaara naagarik apane jeevan ko prabhaavit karane vaale nirnayon mein apanee baat kah sakate hain, aur yah sunishchit karata hai ki sarakaaree tantr un logon ke prati javaabadeh hain jinaka ve pratinidhitv karate hain. yah vyaktiyon ko lokataantrik prakriya mein bhaag lene aur naagarikon ke roop mein apane adhikaaron aur jimmedaariyon ka prayog karane kee anumati deta hai. matadaan ka adhikaar adhikaansh deshon ke sanvidhaanon mein nihit hai, aur ise ek maulik maanavaadhikaar maana jaata hai. haalaanki, matadaan ka adhikaar hamesha sabhee naagarikon ko upalabdh nahin raha hai. kaee deshon mein, vot dene ka adhikaar shuroo mein kuchh visheshaadhikaar praapt logon tak hee seemit tha, jaise jameendaar ya ek nishchit saamaajik varg ke purush. samay ke saath, in pratibandhon ko hata liya gaya hai, aur adhik se adhik naagarikon ko vot dene ka adhikaar pradaan kiya gaya hai.

Keywords

matadaane lokataantrike naagarike pratinidhie visheshaadhikaare maanavaadhikaar.

Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

IESRJ

International Educational Scientific Research Journal

E-ISSN: 2455-295X

International Indexed Journal | Multi-Disciplinary Refereed Research Journal

ISSN: 2455-295X

Peer-Reviewed Journal - Equivalent to UGC Approved Journal

Peer-Reviewed Journal

Article No : 21

Number of Downloads : 129

References

1. Aiken, Christopher H., and Larry M. Bartels. 2017. Realists for Democracy: Why Elections Don't Create Responsive Government. Princeton Studies in Political Behavior, Princeton University Press. (Foreword)
2. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Philip Edward Jones. 2010. “Constituents' Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science, 54(3): 583–597.
3. Black, Duncan. 1948. “On the Justification of Group Decision Making.” Journal of Political Economy, 56(1): 23–34.
4. Belanger, Eric, and Bonnie Meguid. 2008. “Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and Issue-Based Vote Choice.” Electoral Studies, 27: 477-491.
5. Bolsen, Toby, and Thomas J. Leeper. 2013. “Self-Interest and News Attention Among Publics.” Political Communication, 30(3): 329-348.
6. Carpini, Michael X. Daly, and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. Yale University Press. (Foreword)
7. Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David E. Apter, New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 206-261.
8. Converse, Philip E., and Gregory B. Marcus. 1979. “Plus CA Change…: The New CPS Election Study Panel.” American Political Science Review, 73(1): 32–49.
9. Davis, Otto A., Melvin J. Hinich, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1970. “An Explanatory Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review, 64(2): 426–448.